California Partners in Flight Riparian Bird Conservation Plan

Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas)


Photo by Peter Knapp

 

Prepared by: Tina Chouinard (Tina_Chouinard@fws.gov)

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Division of Migratory Bird Management

318-449-8714 phone

RECOMMENDED CITATION

Menges, T. 1998. Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). In The Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: a strategy for reversing the decline of riparian-associated birds in California. California Partners in Flight. http://www.prbo.org/calpif/htmldocs/riparian_v-2.html

SHORTCUTS   

range map

SUBSPECIES STATUS: Geothlypis trichas sinuosa - Salt-marsh Yellowthroat

MANAGEMENT STATUS: (G. t. sinuosa) California Species of Special Concern

DISTRIBUTION

HISTORICAL BREEDING DISTRIBUTION

CURRENT BREEDING DISTRIBUTION

This review is based on mist-netting information, BBS data, and expert opinion (sources noted individually).

The following is a compilation of MAPS stations from 1989-1996 where COYE have been recorded with accompanying breeding status (Institute for Bird Populations, D. Desante, H. Smith)- Lat/Long of MAPS sites with COYE breeding status (Table 1). 25 of the 70 MAPS stations have captured COYE (IBP 1997). COYE attempted to breed at only 10 of these stations, and an occasional breeder at 3 stations (IBP 1997).

Table 1. Latitude and Longitude of current breeding status of Common Yellowthroats at MAPS locations throughout California from 1989-1996 (IBP 1997). This is based on birds captured in mist nets only. Refer to IBP for interpretation of breeding status codes.

Latitude/Longitude Breeding status

40 50 -124 00 Transient

37 47 5 -119 52 Transient

40 45 1 -123 17 Transient

39 42 -120 27 Transient

41 10 -123 30 Transient

41 10 -123 30 Transient

41 10 -123 30 Transient

41 10 -123 30 Transient

41 10 -123 30 Transient

36 10 -121 40 Transient

34 27 -118 51 Occasional breeder

40 06 3 -122 08 3 Occasional breeder

39 41 1 -121 57 5 Breeder

35 40 3 -118 18 1 Breeder

38 55 3 -121 34 5 Occasional breeder

33 22 5 -117 19 2 Breeder

38 15 1 -121 26 2 Breeder

38 15 1 -121 26 2 Breeder

37 12 -120 48 Breeder

37 30 2 -122 29 5 Breeder

36 32 2 -121 55 Breeder

32 52 4 -117 00 2 Breeder

41 27 0 -120 31 4 Breeder

41 10 -124 00 Transient

41 50 -123 10 Transient

Breeding Bird Surveys from 1966-1996 Source: (B. Peterjohn)

I reviewed point count surveys (Provided by B. Peterjohn) from 1966-1985 and 1986-1996 to determine if differences existed in distribution. Common Yellowthroat (COYE) were either seen or heard singing/calling during the breeding season at many locations throughout the state. COYE were recorded in at least one location within each of the 10 Bioregions in California. However, only one location in the Sacramento Valley bioregion had recorded COYE . All other regions had > 2 locations. This is a compilation of all BBS routes in the state of CA. Review rough maps with COYE detected at stations. I highlighted all of the historic and current routes that detected COYE (See Very Rough Maps with Bioregion in black).

Break down by Bioregion (Mist net, BBS, and expert opinion):

Pacific Northwest Bioregion: COYE appears to be historically more common. They were recorded on 17 BBS routes from 1966-1985 whereas from 1986-1996 only 10 routes recorded COYE. Mist netting data indicates COYE as a transient in this region and a fall migrant (C.J. Ralph, IBP).

Northeast Bioregion: COYE was recorded in five areas in the Northeast Bioregion from 1966-1996. Mist netting data confirms that COYE breeds in this area. However, COYE has not been recorded on BBS routes in the southwest portion of this Bioregion (this may be due to the topography). Further investigation is warranted.

Sacramento Valley Bioregion: COYE is a confirmed breeder in this region. However, in the upper and lower Sacramento and Feather rivers, COYE populations have decreased (Gains 1974). Data are inconclusive for the southern portion of this region.

San Joaquin Valley (SJV) Bioregion: COYE has been recorded on BBS routes in the northern SJV, but not in the southern portion. Approximately 15 breeding territories were recorded along the San Joaquin River and Salt Slough (PRBO 1997). COYE also was detected on incidental surveys as far south as the Mendota Wildlife Area, Fresno County. The status of COYE in the southern portion of the SJV needs further investigation.

Bay/Delta Bioregion: Confirmed breeder in the western portion of this region. Also recorded on BBS routes throughout this region. The Bay/Delta Bioregion supports the listed G. t. sinuosa subspecies.

Central Coast Bioregion: According to recent BBS surveys, COYE seem to be absent from the northern portion of this region. Historically, BBS routes detected COYE, but have failed in recent years. However, COYE have been captured in mist nets in this area (see Table 1).

Sierra Nevada Bioregion: BBS routes and reports of COYE in Inyo County indicate that it is a common migrant and breeder (Heindel unpublished). COYE appear absent from the northern portion of this region. However, BBS routes have detected COYE in the southern portion of this bioregion (Peterjohn).

South Coast and Colorado Desert Bioregion:According to MAPS data, BBS routes, and expert opinion (B. Kus and P. Unit), COYE is common in this area.

Mojave Bioregion: COYE seems to be absent from the eastern section of this region, whereas the western region reports numerous observations. B. Kus indicated that only a few COYE in highly optimal habitat exist near Victorville along the Mojave River. Further investigation is warranted in this area.

ECOLOGY

AVERAGE TERRITORY SIZE

Evens et al. (1997) report 1.04 territories per hectare and 5.48 territories per km when design data is pooled (i.e., burned and unburned plots) for G.t. sinuosa at Point Reyes National Seashore. In Michigan, home ranges vary from 0.3-0.7 ha (Stewart 1953). In New York, COYE were spaced 2.0-2.4 ha. In the San Francisco Bay, 0.2-2.0 ha spacing reported by Foster (1977).

TIME OF OCCURRENCE AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS

Woodrey and Chandler (1997) indicate no significant difference between adults and immatures in timing of passage at any site studied. However, this varied between year and site. Grinnell and Miller (1944) indicate COYE is a summer resident from mid-April until September in northern CA, and is a winter resident in central and southern CA. Nevertheless, they are uncommon in CA during the winter months (Grinnell and Miller 1944).

MIGRATION/STOPOVER CHARACTERISTICS

FOOD HABITS

FORAGING STRATEGY

Sally and gleaner of insects, spiders, and caterpillers (Bent 1953).

DIET

DRINKING

BREEDING HABITAT

NEST SITE

COYE needs tall, emergent herbaceous wetlands (Timossi 1990).

Vegetation Surrounding the Nest

Need more info.

Height of Nest

Ground level to 3 m, but most commonly found between ground level and 0.6 m.

Height of Nest Plant

0-3 m (based on height of nest).

Plant Species Concealing Nest

The nest contains dead grasses, leaves, ferns, etc., and is lined with fine grasses and hair (Harrison 1978, Zeiner et al. 1990).

Percent Nest Cover

Needs analysis (from Evens et al. 1997).

NEST TYPE

Open-cup nest

BREEDING BIOLOGY

DISPLAYS

Flight song and perch song (Kowalski 1983).

MATING SYSTEM

Occasionally polygynous

CLUTCH SIZE

Generally 3-6 eggs

INCUBATION

Female

INCUBATION PERIOD

12 days

DEVELOPMENT AT HATCHING

Altricial development (Harrison 1978).

NESTLING PERIOD

9-10 days (Harrison 1978).

PARENTAL CARE

Both male and female tend young.

NUMBER OF BROODS

2 (Ehrlich et al. 1988)

BROOD PARASITISM

COYE is a common Brown-headed Cowbird host. A study in Michigan reported 10 of 22 nests parasitized (Stewart 1953). In the Central Valley of California, 7 of 14 nests were parasitized (Geupel et al. 1995-1997, Draft Progress Reports).

LANDSCAPE FACTORS

ELEVATION

The COYE is found from sea level to at least 450 m in Bishop, California. More information needed.

FRAGMENTATION

No information on the effects of fragmentation on COYE.

PATCH SIZE

Territory/home range size is reported as 0.4-1.2 hectares, suggesting there may be a minimum wetland size for breeding. However, more information is needed.

DISTURBANCE

Livestock grazing intensity, loss and destruction of wetland habitats (Airola 1990). COYEs are sensitive to destruction of wetlands and grazing, especially in certain parts of California. However, more data are needed to fully assess this issue, perhaps concentrating on the Central Valley where wetland loss is documented.

ADJACENT LAND USE

Although this species primarily uses marsh habitats, riparian habitat may be important as a corridor and for other activities (Birds of North America).

CLIMATE

Generalist.

PESTICIDE

Information is lacking on the effects of pesticides on this species.

PREDATORS

Studies in the northern prairies of Canada and North Dakota have shown that incidental depredation may be harmful to ground-nesting birds (Vickery et al. 1992). Snakes, accipiters, and small mammals are known predators. COYEs also are parasitized frequently (Bent 1953, Ehrlich et al. 1988).

DEMOGRAPHY AND POPULATION TRENDS

DEMOGRAPHICS

POPULATION TREND

MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND OPTIONS

EXOTIC SPECIES INVASION/ENCROACHMENT

Information Needed.

HABITAT LOSS

MANAGEMENT

ASSOCIATED BIRD SPECIES

HABITAT AND POPULATION OBJECTIVES

MONITORING METHODS AND RESEARCH NEEDS

SCIENTIFIC REFERENCES

Airola, D.A. 1986. Brown-Headed Cowbird parasitism and habitat disturbance in the Sierra Nevada. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(4):571-575.

American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds. 6th ed. Am. Ornithol. Union, Washington, D.C.

Atwood, J.L. 1994. Endangered small landbirds of the western United States. Studies in Avian Biology 15:328-339.

Beal, F.E.L. 1907. Birds of California in relation to the fruit industry (Part 1). U.S. Dept. Agri. Biol. Surv. Bull. 30.

Beedy, E.C. and S.L. Granholm. 1985. Discovering Sierra birds: western slope. Yosemite Natural History Association and Sequoia Natural History Association, USA.

Beer, J.R., L.D. Frenzel and N. Hansen. 1956. Minimum space requirements of some nesting passerine birds. Wilson Bulletin. 68(3):200-209.

Bent, A.C. 1963. Life histories of North American wood warblers. Dover Publications Inc., NY.

Bierman, G.C. and S.G. Sealy. 1982. Parental feeding of nestling Yellow Warblers in relation to brood size and prey availability. Auk. 99:332-341.

Blakesley, J.A. and K.R. Peese. 1988. Avian use of campground and noncampground sites in riparian zones. Journal of Wildlife Management 52(3):399-402.

Briskie, J.V. 1995. Nesting Biology of the Yellow Warbler at the Northern Limits of its Range. Journal of Field Ornithology. 66:531-543.

Burridge, B. 1995. Sonoma county Breeding Bird Atlas: detailed maps and accounts for our nesting birds. Madrone Audubon Society, Santa Rosa, CA.

Busby, D.G. and S.G. Sealy. 1979. Feeding ecology of nesting Yellow Warblers. Can. J. Zool. 57:1670-1681.

Cardiff, E.A. 1989. Breeding Bird Census 1988 : Desert Riparian-Freshwater Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 60:63.

Cardiff, E.A. 1992. Breeding Bird Census 1991: Desert Riparian-Freshwater Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 63:96-97.

Cardiff, E.A. 1996. Breeding Bird Census 1995 : Desert Riparian-Freshwater Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:75.
Chapman, F.M. 1968. Warblers of North America. Dover Publications Inc. NY.

Clark, K.L., and R.J. Robertson. 1981. Cowbird parasitism and evolution of anti-parasite strategies in the Yellow Warbler. Wilson Bulletin. 93(2):249-258.

Collins, S.L. 1981. A comparison of nest-site and perch-site vegetation structure for seven species of warbler. Wilson Bulletin. 93:542-547.

Dawson, W.L. 1923. Birds of California. South Moulton Co., San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco.

DellaSala, D.A. 1986. Polygyny in the Yellow Warbler. Wilson Bulletin 98(1):152-154.

Desante, D. and D.G. Ainley. 1980. The Avifauna of the South Farallon Islands, California. Studies in Avian Biology No. 4. Cooper Ornithological Society,

Dixon, J.B. 1934. Records of the nesting of certain birds in eastern California. Condor. 36:35-36.

Dunn, J.L., and K.L. Garrett. 1997. A Field Guide to the Warblers of North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York 656pp.

Evens, J.G., and R.W. Stallcup. 1992. Breeding Bird Census 1991 : Coastal RiparianMarsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 63:95-96.

Ehrlich, P.R., D.S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The birder's handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and SchusterInc., New York, NY.

Ficken, M.S. and R.W. Ficken. 1966. Notes on the male and habitat selection in the Yellow Warbler. Wilson Bulletin. 78:232-233.

Fatooh, J. 1996. Preliminary results of 1995 breeding bird censuses in riparian areas, Bishop RA. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management, Bishop Resource Area.

Fatooh, J. 1997. Breeding birds of Wilson Creek. Unpublished report to the Bureau of Land Management, Bishop Resource Area.

Gaines, D. 197?. The nesting riparian avifauna of the Sacramento Valley, California and the Status of the Yellow-Billed Cuckoo. MS thesis, University of California, Davis.

Gaines, D. 1977. Birds of the Yosemite Sierra. GRT Book Printing, Oakland, CA.

Gaines, D. 1974. A new look at the nesting riparian avifauna of the Sacramento River Valley, California. Western Birds. 5:61-84.

Gaines, D. 1988. Birds of Yosemite and the East Slope. Artemesia Press, Lee Vining, CA.

Gardali, T. and G.R. Geupel. 1997. Songbird inventory and monitoring at Golden Gate National Recreation Area. PRBO unpublished report. Stinson Beach, CA.

Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California: status and distribution. L.A. Audubon, Artisan Press, Los Angeles, CA.

Geupel, G.R. and N. Nur. 1993. Evaluation of migration monitoring at the Palomarin Field Station: Population trends in California and the West, 1980-1992. Paper presented at the "Workshop to Develop a North American Monitoring Program for Landbird Species Nesting in Northern Canada and Alaska." Simcoe, Ontario. September 1993.

Geupel, G,R., G. Ballard. 1995. Status and distribution of the landbird avifauna along riparian corridors of the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge: Results of the 1994 field season. PRBO report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife. Stinson Beach, CA.

Geupel, G,R., G. Ballard, A. Kiener. 1996a. Songbird monitoring within the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge: Results from the 1995 field season. PRBO report to the US Fish and Wildlife. Stinson Beach, CA.

Geupel, G,R., G. Ballard, N. Nur, A. King. 1996b. Population status and habitat associations of songbirds along riparian corridors of the Lower Sacramento River: Results from 1995 field season and summary of results 1993 to 1995. PRBO report to the US Fish and Wildlife and The Nature Conservancy. Stinson Beach, CA.

Geupel, G,R., G. Ballard, A. King. 1997a. Songbird monitoring on the Cosumnes River Preserve: Results from the 1995 field season. PRBO report to The Nature Conservancy. Stinson Beach, CA.

Geupel, G,R., A. King, G. Ballard. 1997b. Songbird monitoring within the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge: Results from the 1996 field season. PRBO report to the US Fish and Wildlife. Stinson Beach, CA.

Goosen, P.J. and S.G. Sealy. 1982. Production of young in a dense nesting population of yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia, in Manitoba. Can. Field-Nat. 96:189-199.

Graham, D.S. 1988. Responses of five host species to cowbird parasitism. Condor. 90:588-591.

Greenberg, R., and J.S. Ortiz. 1994. Interspecific defense of pasture trees by wintering Yellow Warblers. Auk. 111(3):672-682.

Grinnell, J. 1914. An account of the mammals and birds of the lower Colorado Valley with especial reference to the distributional problems presented. University of California Publications in Zoology 12(4):51-294.

Grinnell, J. 1915. A distributional list of the birds of California. Pac. Coast Avifauna 11. Cooper Ornithological Club, Hollywood, CA.

Grinnell, J., and M.W. Wythe. 1927. Directory to the bird life of the San Francisco bay region. Pac. Coast Avifauna 18. Cooper Ornithological Club, Berkeley, CA.

Grinnell, J., J. Dixon, and J.M. Linsdale. 1930. Vertebrate Natural History of a Section of Northern California through the Lassen Peak Region. Univ. Cal. Publ. Zool. 35(5):1-594.

Grinnell, J., and A.H. Miller. 1944. The distribution of the birds of California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 27. Cooper Ornithological Club, Berkeley, CA.

Grisom, L. and A.Sprunt Jr. 1979. The warblers of America. Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, NY .

Harris, S.W. 1991. Northwestern California birds: A guide to the status, distribution, and habitats for the birds of Del Norte, Humboldt, Trinity, northern Mendocino, and western Siskiyou counties California. Humboldt State University Press, Arcata, CA.

Harrison, C.J.O. and P.J. Baicich. 1997. A guide to the nests, eggs, and nestlings of North American birds. 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Hebart, P.N. and S.G. Sealy. 1993. Hatching asynchrony and feeding rates in Yellow Warblers: a test of the sexual conflict hypothesis. Am. Nat. 142(5):881-892.

Hilty, S.L. and W.L. Brown. 1986. A guide to the birds of Columbia. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.

Howell, A.B. 1917. Birds of the islands off the coast of Southern California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 12.

Howell, S.N.G. and S.Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. Oxford University Press. NY.

Hunter, W.C. 1984. Status of nine bird species of special concern along the Colorado River. California Dept. Fish and Game. Wildlife Management Branch Administrative Report No. 84-2.

Hutto, R.L. 1981. Seasonal variation in the foraging behavior of some migratory western wood warblers. Auk 98:765-777.

Katibah, E.F. 1984. A brief history of riparian forests in the central valley of California. In California riparian systems: ecology, conservation, and productive management. R.E. Warner and K.M. Hendrix eds. University of California Press Ltd. London, England.

Kendeigh, S.C. 1941b. Birds of a prairie community. Condor 43:165-174.

King, A. and G.R. Geupel. 1997a. Songbird response to revegetation efforts along the Sacramento River: results from the 1996 field season. PRBO unpublished report. Stinson Beach, CA.

King, A., and G.R. Geupel. 1997b. Songbird Monitoring on the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge: Progress report on the 1997 field season. PRBO unnpublished report to FWS Region 1 Nongame Program and SLNWR, Stinson Beach, CA.

Knopf, F.L., J. Sedgwick, and R.W. Cannon. 1980. Guild structure of a riparian avifauna relative to seasonal cattle grazing. Journal of Wildlife Management. 52(2):280-290.

Knopf, F.L., and J.A. Sedgwick. 1992. An Experimental study of nest-site selection by Yellow Warblers. Condor . 94:734-742.

Laymon, S.A. 1981. Avifauna of an island of lowland riparian woodland: Dog Island City Park, Red Bluff, California. MS thesis, California State University, Chico.

Laymon, S.A. 1984. Riparian bird community structure and dynamics: Dog Island, Red Bluff, California. Pp 587-597 in California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management (R.E.Warner and K.M. Hendrix Eds.). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Lehman, P.E. 1994. The birds of Santa Barbara county, California. Vertebrate Museum University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Lozano, G.A. and R.E. Lemon. 1996. Male plumage, paternal care and reproductive success in Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia). Anim. Behav. 51(2):265-272.

Mailliard, J. 1900. Land birds of Marin County, California. Condor 2:62-68.

Martinsen, G.D. and T.G. Whitham. More birds nest in hybrid cottonwood trees. Wilson Bulletin. 106:474-481.

Monson, G., and A. Phillips. 1981. Revised checklist of Arizona birds. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.

Morse, D.H. 1973. The foraging of small populations of Yellow Warblers and American Redstarts. Ecology. 54(2):347-355.

Morton, E.S. 1975. The adaptive significance of dull coloration in Yellow Warblers.

Mowbray, M.V. 1947. Notes on the birds of the upper Salinas Valley, California. Condor 49:173-174.

Neff, J.A. 1930. Cowbirds in the Sacramento Valley. Condor 32:250-252.

Nur, N., G.R. Geupel, and Grant Ballard. 1993. Assessing the impact of the Cantara Spill on terrestrial bird populations along the riparian corridors of the Sacramento River: Results from the 1992 field season and comparison to 1991. PRBO report to California Fish and Game. Stinson Beach, CA.

Nur, N., G.R. Geupel, and Grant Ballard. 1994. Assessing the impact of the Cantara Spill on terrestrial bird populations along the Sacramento River: Results from the 1993 field season. PRBO report to Calif. Dept. of Fish and Game.

Nur, N., G.R. Geupel, and Grant Ballard. 1995. Assessing the impact of the Cantara Spill on terrestrial bird populations along the Sacramento River: Results from the 1994 field season and comparison with results, 1991-1994. PRBO report to Calif. Dept. Fish and Game. Stinson Beach, CA.

Nur, N., C.J. Ralph, S. Laymon, G.R. Geupel, D. Evans. 1996a. Save Our Songbirds Songbird Conservation in California's Riparian Habitats: Population Assessments and Management Recommendations. PRBO report to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Project No, 94-232. Stinson Beach, CA.

Nur, N., G.R. Geupel, and Grant Ballard. 1996b. Assessing the impact of the Cantara Spill on terrestrial bird populations along the Sacramento River: Results from the 1995 field season and comparison with results, 1991-1994. PRBO report to Calif. Dept. Fish and Game. Stinson Beach, CA.

Nur, N., G.R. Geupel, and Grant Ballard. 1997. Assessing the impact of the Cantara Spill on terrestrial bird populations along the Sacramento River: Results from the 1996 field season and comparison with results, 1992-1996. PRBO report to Calif. Dept. Fish and Game. Stinson Beach, CA.

Ohmart, R.D. 1994. The effects of human-induced changes on the avifauna of western riparian habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 15:273-285.

Petit, D.R., K.E. Petit, and L.J. Petit. 1990. Geographic variation in foraging ecology of North American insectivorous birds. Studies in Avian Biology 13:254-263.

Remsen, J.V. Jr.1978. Bird species of special concern in California. Cal. Dept. Fish and Game. Wildlife Management Branch Admin. Report No. 78-1. 54pp.

Riensche, D. 1992. Breeding Bird Census 1991: Western Sycamore Woodland with Scattered Oaks. Journal of Field Ornithology. 63:36.

Riensche, D., M. Morrow, and C. Garcia. 1996. Breeding Bird Census 1995 : Willow Riparian Woodland and Edge. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:29-30.

Roberson, D. 1985. Monterey Birds. Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, Carmel, CA.

Roberson, D. and C. Tenney. 1993. Atlas of the breeding birds of Monterey county, California. Monterey Peninsula Audubon Society, Carmel, CA.

Rogers, C.M. 1994. Avian nest success, brood parasitism and edge-independent reproduction in an Alaskan wetland. Journal of Field Ortnithology. 65:433-440.

Rosenberg, K.V., R.D. Ohmart, W.C. Hunter, B.W. Anderson. 1991. Birds of the lower Colorado River valley. University of Arizona Press.

Rothstein, S.I., J. Verner, and E. Stevens. 1980. Range expansion and diurnal changes in dispersion of the Brown-Headed Cowbird in the Sierra Nevada. Auk 97:253-267.

Rowley, J.S. 1939. Breeding birds of Mono county, California. Condor. 41:247-254.

Salt, G.W. 1957. An analysis of avifaunas in the Teton Mountains and Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Condor. 59:373-393.

Schrantz, F.G. 1943. Nest life of the Eastern Yellow Warbler. Auk. 60:367-387.

Shuford, W.D. 1993. The Marin county breeding bird atlas: A distributional and natural history of coastal California. Bushtit Books, Bolinas, CA.

Small, A. 1994. California birds : their status and distribution. Ibis, Vista, CA.

Smyth, M., and H.N. Coulumbe. 1971. Notes on the use of desert springs by birds in California. Condor 73:240-243.
Stauffer, D.F. and L.B. Best. 1980. Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluating effects of habitat alterations. Journal of Wildlife Mangement. 44(1):1-14.

Stephens, L.A. and C.C. Pringle. 1933. Birds of Marin County, California. Gull 18, No. 6.

Studd, M.V. and R.J. Robertson. 1985a. Sexual selection and variation in reproductive strategy in male Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 101-109.

Studd, M.V. and R.J. Robertson. 1985b. Evidence for reliable badges of status in territorial Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia). Anim. Behav. 133:1102-1113.

Studd, M.V. and R.J. Robertson. 1985c. Life span, competition, and delayed plumage maturation in male passerines: the breeding threshold hypothesis. Am. Nat. 126:101-115.

Studd, M.V. and R.J. Robertson. 1988. Different allocation of reproductive effort to territorial establishment and maintenance by male Yellow Warblers (Dendroica petechia). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23:

Studd, M.V. and R.J. Robertson. 1989. Influence of age and territory quality on the reproductive behavior of male Yellow Warblers. Can. J. Zool. 67:268-273.

Taylor, D.M. and C.D. Littlefield. 1986. Willow Flycatcher and Yellow Warbler response to cattle grazing. American Birds. 40:1169-1173.

Tyler, J.G. 1913. Some birds of the Fresno District, California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 9: 99.

USDA. 1994. Neotropical Migratory Bird Reference Book. USDA, USFS, Pac. SW Region, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Rare plants staff.

Verner, J. and A.S. Boss. 1980. California wildlife and their habitats: Western Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-37. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., USFS, U.S. Dept. Agric., Berkeley, CA.

Verner, J. and L.V. Ritter. 1983. Current status of the Brown-Headed Cowbird in the Sierra National Forest. Auk. 100:355-368.

Weaver, K.L. 1992. Breeding Bird Census 1991 : Riparian Woodland. Journal of Field Ornithology 63:35-36.

Weston, H.G. 1948. Spring arrival of summer residents in the Berkeley area, California. Condor. 50:81.

Willett, G. 1912. Birds of the Pacific Slope of Southern California. Pacific Coast Avifauna 7:95-96.

Willett, G. 1933. A revised list of the birds of southwest California. Pacific Coast Avifauna #7. Cooper Ornithological Club, Berkeley, CA.

Yezerinac, S.M. 1995. Extra-pair mating in Yellow Warblers: sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird (Dendroica petechia). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37:179-188.

Yezerinac, S.M., P.J. Weatherhead, P.T. Boag, 1996. Cuckoldry and lack of parentage-dependant paternal care in Yellow Warblers: a cost-benefit approach. Anim. Behav. 52(4):821-832.

Zeiner, D. et al. 1990. California's Wildlife Vol. 3. Birds. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System. Dept. Fish and Game. Sacramento, CA.