Figure 1. Proportion of increasing, decreasing, and stable population trends among the 24 species that require or substantially utilize montane meadow habitat and have calculable BBS population trends.
Figure 1. Proportion of increasing, decreasing, and stable population
trends among the 24 species that require or substantially utilize montane
meadow habitat and have calculable BBS population trends.
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 2. Number of increasing versus decreasing BBS population trends among species that are a) critically dependent on montane meadow ('crit.'), b) strongly associated with, though not critically dependent upon montane meadows ('imp.'), and c) critically dependent or strong associated with montane meadows. Asterisks indicate statistically significant departures from the expected distribution of decreasing and increasing trends, due to chance (P < 0.05).
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 3. Proportion of the 20 species that require or substantially
utilize LS/OG forest and have BBS population trends, that are decreasing,
increasing, or stable.
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 4. Number of increasing versus decreasing BBS population
trends among species that are a) critically dependent on LS/OG forest ('crit.'),
b) strongly associated with, though not critically dependent on LS/OG forest
('imp.'), and c) critically dependent on, or stronly associatd with LS/OG
forest. No comparisons reached the threshold of statistical significance
(Binomial Test, P > 0.05).
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 5. Proportion of the 19 species that require or substantially
utilize oaks or oak woodlands and have BBS population trends, that are
decreasing, increasing or stable.
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 6. Number of increasing versus decreasing population trends
among species that are a) critically dependent on oaks or oak woodland
('crit.'), b) strongly associated with, though not critically dependent
on oaks or oak woodland ('imp.'), and c) critically dependent or strongly
associated with oaks or oak woodland ('crit. or imp.'). Asterisks
indicate statistically significant departures from distributions expected
due to chance (Binomial Test, P < 0.05).
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 7. Percent of calculable BBS population trends within each migratory status classification that are increasing, stable or decreasing. Numbers above bars indicate total number of species with calculable trends in each migratory status classification.
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 8. Number of species with decreasing and increasing Sierra-wide trends, grouped by migratory status. Migratory status classifications are discussed in the text and in Table 10. Asterisk indicates a statistically significant departure from the expected distribution (Binomial Test, P < 0.005).
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)
Figure 9. Productivity indices from MAPS stations at Yosemite National Park vs. productivity indices from MAPS stations on and adjacent to Tahoe National Forest. Asterisks indicate comparisons that differ at least by 10%.
(Press the Back button on your browser to return to the
text.)