Soil

Since 2014, Point Blue Conservation Science has tested soils across TomKat Ranch. These data allow us to evaluate soil productivity throughout the ranch and track changes over time.

SMART Goals

Increase soil sponginess: All RMN points surpass NRCS compaction and water infiltration targets by 2020.

Increase soil organic carbon (SOC): All RMN points gain 0.5% SOC in 0-10 cm by 2021.*

*Of the points that gained soil carbon on TomKat Ranch between 2015-2018, 0.5% was the average magnitude of change. We therefore feel this goal is ambitious but achievable.

Soil productivity

In 2021, we measured three indicators of soil productivity at 15 sites: organic carbon content at two depths (0-10cm and 10-40cm), surface soil bulk density, and water infiltration rates. We also produced an overall score combining all three indicators.

In the map below, each point represents a soil sample location, with colors representing the score for each indicator. For carbon, the inner circle represents the surface soil sample (0-10 cm deep), and the outer circle represents the deeper soil sample (10-40 cm). Two locations where compost was applied are marked with a heavy black border.

Choose one metric at a time at bottom left. Click on any of the survey points for details.

Changes in soil productivity

We compared data collected in 2021 to data collected in 2018 to identify sites where productivity indicators have improved or declined: 93% showed an improvement or no change in their overall soil productivity since 2018. Locations where compost was applied are marked with a heavy black border. Note that lower values in bulk density and water infiltration represent improvements.

Choose one metric at a time at bottom left. Click on any of the survey points to learn more.

Soil nutrient concentrations

In 2021, we also measured the pH and the concentrations soil nutrients important to plant growth at two soil depths. In the map below, the inner circle represents the surface soil sample (0-10 cm deep), and the outer circle represents the deeper soil sample (10-40 cm).

Choose one metric at a time at bottom left. Click on any of the survey points to learn more.

Changes in soil nutrient concentrations

We compared data collected in 2021 to data collected in 2018 to identify locations where each soil nutrient concentration has increased or decreased. Locations where compost was applied are marked with a heavy black border. In the map below, the inner circle represents the change in surface soil (0-10 cm deep), and the outer circle represents the change in deeper soil (10-40 cm).

Choose one metric at a time at bottom left. Click on any of the survey points to learn more.

Soil microbes

In 2018, we analyzed the richness and composition of soil bacterial communities by sequencing DNA. Click on any of the survey points to see a comparison of the proportion of bacterial phyla present at the surface and in deeper soils.


Glossary

Bulk density: An indicator of soil compaction, bulk density is measured as the weight of a soil sample divided by its volume (grams/cm3). Compacted soils have a higher bulk density, with reduced pore space for water infiltration, water retention, root growth, soil aeration, and seedling germination.

Water infiltration rate: Also an indicator of soil compaction, water infiltration rate is measured as the time required for soil to absorb water (minutes per inch of water). Compacted soils take longer to absorb water, increasing runoff and decreasing water available for local plant growth.

Organic carbon content: An indicator of soil organic matter and soil productivity, organic carbon is measured as the percent of soil volume made up by organic carbon. Productive soils have an abundant microbial community that contribute to high levels of soil organic matter, driving plant growth and improving soil stabilization and capacity for storing water.

Overall productivity score: To identify the overall most productive locations within TomKat Ranch, or the least productive locations that may be good candidates for management actions, we combined values of all 3 soil indicators above into one overall score. We fit empirical cumulative distribution functions to each productivity indicator (including separate scores for surface and deeper soil carbon) that effectively ranked each sampling location against each other. We reversed the bulk density and water infiltration rankings because for these indicators, lower values are better for soil productivity. We then calculated an overall percentile score as the mean of these individual percentile scores, weighting each indicator equally, so that a high value represents a relatively high overall productivity. *Note: These scores are only based on comparing these locations at TomKat to each other and not to values that may be found elsewhere on the ranch or beyond.

Total Nitrogen: An indicator of all nitrogen in the soil, whether it is readily bioavailable or not. Nitrogen is an important and often limiting plant nutrient, and this indicator includes both organic and inorganic (ammonium, nitrate) forms.

Extractable Phosphorus: An indicator of bioavailable phosphorus, which is an important and often limiting plant nutrient.

Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium: Indicators of soil fertility, calcium, magnesium, and potassium are essential plant nutrients. Together with sodium, they make up the majority of base (positively charged, non-acidic) cations in the soil.

Cation Exchange Capacity: An indicator of the relative ability of soils to store cations. The larger the number, the more cations (both base and acidic cations such as aluminum) the soil can hold. Cation exchange capacity values have been estimated here by summing the base cations, an approach that slightly underestimates capacity in acidic soil such as those at TomKat Ranch.

pH: An indicator of the relative acidity or alkalinity of the soil. Soil pH affects the availability of some plant nutrients such as phosphorus and iron. All else being equal, nutrient availability is optimized in soils that have a near-neutral pH (6.5-7.5).

Bacterial and fungal richness: The number of bacterial and fungal species observed in each soil sample. (Species were determined using operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity. An OTU is composed of a group of closely related individuals.)

Bacterial phyla: A level of taxonomic classification that falls between kingdom and class. While birds and plants are often discussed at the genus or species level, bacteria are often discussed at the phylum level. Some ecological traits and life strategies are shared at this broad level, so that meaningful interpretations can be inferred. For example, differences in traits associated with an oligotrophic lifestyle (microbes that prefer low nutrient and carbon conditions) or copiotrophic lifestyle (microbes that prefer high nutrient and carbon conditions) can occur at the phylum level.

About this page

This interactive web page was produced in R using rmarkdown and the packages leaflet and plotly. The code used to produce this web page is available on Github.

For more information

Please contact:
Chelsea Carey, PhD
Working Lands Research Director Point Blue Conservation Science